Home › Forums › Windstone Editions › Ask Melody › Ever thought about doing a baby spectral?
- This topic has 89 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 18 years, 1 month ago by Starbreeze.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 9, 2006 at 2:22 pm #513027skigod377 wrote:
Its very nice. Im just waiting for a special color. Your website is Sweeeet.
Thanks. 😀 I did it myself with some Yahoo software. It was free when I got the domain name through them. Easy to do. And easy to change, so I can keep it up to date. I think working on the Web site is almost as addicting as the Windstones themselves.
There was another thread that Melody said she was thinking about doing a Cockatrice. My husband sculpted a Cockatrice Fossil that’s on the Web site. I wonder what Melody’s will look like.
December 9, 2006 at 6:44 pm #513028I will have to Google that…
December 10, 2006 at 5:18 am #513029A cockatrice is another name for the basilisk.
The pic isn’t as I imagine my namesake. I’m still working on a personal rendition that I’ll put in my signature.December 10, 2006 at 7:26 am #513030There was a basalisk in the first Harry Potter movie too, wasn’t there? (or at least the second movie)
December 10, 2006 at 7:34 am #513031It was in the second one. *nodnods* A kinda not-quite-traditional version of one though.
December 10, 2006 at 7:51 am #513032Didn’t they call that snake thing a basilisk? In my opinion, that critter was more of a dipsa, since I don’t think it had wings or legs. But I don’t remember it very well. Did it have horns? Then they should have called it a cerastes. But a basilisk can be just about anything, so I guess that rendition was artistic freedom.
December 10, 2006 at 8:15 am #513033It was a basilisk based mostly on the paralysis/turning to stone ability, I believe, rather than appearance, as it just looked like a giant snake, both in the movie and in the book’s description.
December 10, 2006 at 9:15 am #513034Greater Basilisk wrote:A cockatrice is another name for the basilisk.
The pic isn’t as I imagine my namesake. I’m still working on a personal rendition that I’ll put in my signature.Thanks!
December 10, 2006 at 9:15 am #513035In that case Rowling just left out the interesting details in appearance. Probably made it easier to animate too. Thanks, SPark.
December 10, 2006 at 11:31 am #513036to me a basilisk or cockatrice should look like this:
but the harry potter one looked like this:
it was like a big snake with horns and more lizardy head
December 10, 2006 at 11:46 am #513037ruffian wrote:That has got to be the ugliest animal I have ever seen. It looks like a deformed chicken.
December 10, 2006 at 1:09 pm #513038They were said to be created when a rooster layed an egg and the egg was hatched by a snake after a huge number of years or somehting like that I cant quite remember the whole thing.
December 10, 2006 at 2:24 pm #513039In that pic you can really see where the idea for a Cockrice came from though…that looks just like many dinosaurs!
I mean look at this thing!
If you were a medival man plowing in your fields and you found that…wouldn’t you assume it was a giant snake chicken too? *giggles*December 10, 2006 at 2:35 pm #513040Wow, thats cool.
December 10, 2006 at 2:38 pm #513041Here’s my husband’s version. He went with the chicken-lizard-snake combo idea.
http://www.emeraldsemporium.com/images/Cockatrice_Upright_2.JPG
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.