Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
As it stands the rule is ‘2 per customer’. So if two different people order them, regardless of their address, that should be respected. If someone and their mother each wanted two, then they should each be able to order two, period. Yes there is a loophole, but alpha did not appear to be exploiting it, and neither am I. The other two belong to my S.O. and if he wants to buy the two limit, he should be able to do that. It would be fishy if the money came out of the same account, but it didnt. He paid for his. I paid for mine. Two customers, same household should NOT matter. He tends a collection of his own completely separate of mine.
And the ‘oh mom and my best friend and neighbor etc etc can order FOR me so i get 10’ is a loophole also, but until Susie says someone actually tries it, I’m not going to worry about it. Next batch, if my S.O. wants a couple more, he’ll get them. I’m not stopping him. Guess it depends on how his experience with these go. Which hopefully he will never see this kind of a post, because he would not be amused over this sort of subject concerning his private purchase (or anyone else in the same boat for that matter).
I still believe in the 2 per person rule. No more, no less. I’m certainly capable of buying 10 if I wanted, but so are plenty of others. If it wasnt for the ‘2 per’ rule, we’d have a lot of repeat experiences like that first batch of young unicorns. A lot less people would have them.
Though those of us lucky enough to be on when they are released, should not be made to feel guilty for our purchases from those who were not. I’d be disappointed too, but I’d just be more determined to be there when the next ones go in the store. If you arent going to be around, maybe enlist the help of another forum member who will be?
Edit: This is Wampus. S.O. must have left his account logged in. So I guess this is his name here.
