- This topic has 130 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by .
-
Posts
-
I think your apology goes a long way and I don’t think you were the only person going over the line that shouldn’t be crossed on a forum. It’s a shame that some people think that irresponsible behavior or flagrant disregard for forum rules is acceptable at any time, ie. if the person “deserves” it. I do appreciate your acknowledgement that you could have handled yourself better, because I personally think you are a better person than some of your more hostile posts could suggest to strangers. I think you deserve better for yourself *hugs*
sunhawk wrote:I think your apology goes a long way and I don’t think you were the only person going over the line that shouldn’t be crossed on a forum. It’s a shame that some people think that irresponsible behavior or flagrant disregard for forum rules is acceptable at any time, ie. if the person “deserves” it. I do appreciate your acknowledgement that you could have handled yourself better, because I personally think you are a better person than some of your more hostile posts could suggest to strangers. I think you deserve better for yourself *hugs*
Thank you. I was just angry.
Around the end of the month people!! Be forwarned!!
Alright Ski, behave, or I’ll set your rank to rotate with your mood. 😯
I don’t know what this is all about, and it seems the juicy thread has been removed, but considering there are always two sides to an argument and only Ski is apologizing for anything, it puts Ski in a pretty good light. 😉
I could just put it on random and it would be pretty accurate. 😆 😆 😆 😆 don’t hit me ok hit me I like it
Greater Basilisk wrote:I don’t know what this is all about, and it seems the juicy thread has been removed, but considering there are always two sides to an argument and only Ski is apologizing for anything, it puts Ski in a pretty good light. 😉
ah, well, the other party, I believe, has been banned from the forum (not that she would have apologized, I dunno about that). You did miss an entertaining “arguement” though.
She was actually banned?! Poor Nam! Now I’m bummed that I wasn’t on over the weekend to see the spat, though.
Greater Basilisk wrote:She was actually banned?! Poor Nam! Now I’m bummed that I wasn’t on over the weekend to see the spat, though.
Don’t feel bad, GB; I *was* on over the weekend, and missed it, anyway. 😉 It must’ve been pretty darned quick. 😯 Not that it really matters….I hate soap operas. 😈 But this must have happened in here whilst I was browsing around somewhere else on here.
So I take it that individual posts can’t be subject to moderator’s approval prior to actually posting, or is that just too much of a headache?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
