fbpx

OMG!!!!!

Home Forums Miscellany Community OMG!!!!!

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #498512
    Laurie
    Participant

      #770769
      Laurie
      Participant
        #770770

        😮 🙁 :shout:

        C’mon, it’s a Friday, couldn’t you pick a happy headline!?

        #770771
        Laurie
        Participant

          Sorry, I just couldn’t believe what I read. 😡 😡

          #770772
          chrisherself
          Participant

            Wow, when all the replies are solid smilies (frownies in this case) you KNOW you have to check it out.

            All I have to say is…10 times? 😡 😡 😡 😡 😡 😡 😡 😡 😡 😡

            #770773
            Skigod377
            Participant

              Hell hath no fury? What a Bootch. I have heard of worse, but this is pretty sick. What’s wrong with people? :shrug:

              #770774

              No words, just extreme anger and disgust. 👿

              #770775
              Jennifer
              Keymaster

                Devil’s advocate here, but I don’t know if I agree that it was an act of cruelty, unless she was attempting to cause pain and suffering to the poor dog. If she did not shoot to kill, then yes I agree that it is indeed cruelty. The article really isn’t clear in this.
                I want to make it clear that I don’t agree at all with what she did– totally sad and unnecessary… 🙁

                Volunteer mod- I'm here to help! Email me for the best response: nambroth at gmail.com
                My art: featherdust.com

                #770776
                Kujacker
                Participant

                  :puke: How vile. I cannot believe some people. All I have to say about that.

                  Why could she not have just sold the dog, or given him away?

                  #770777
                  Skigod377
                  Participant

                    Jennifer wrote:

                    Devil’s advocate here, but I don’t know if I agree that it was an act of cruelty, unless she was attempting to cause pain and suffering to the poor dog. If she did not shoot to kill, then yes I agree that it is indeed cruelty. The article really isn’t clear in this.
                    I want to make it clear that I don’t agree at all with what she did– totally sad and unnecessary… 🙁

                    I think the dog was shot, like, a dozen times or something, so def shooting to kill and not torture, I would guess. Just to get back at the ex gf in a really mean way. Poor pup.

                    #770778

                    That makes me sick. Poor puppy 😥 I couldn’t imagine killing anything to get back at someone.

                    #770779

                    How sick and twisted. Animals have feelings, too; that dog didn’t know it was a present from an ex-lover.

                    #770780
                    Bob

                      that is SOOO unbelievable SICK and SAD!!

                      #770781

                      That makes me really upset. 🙁

                      #770782

                      I am sorry, but I believe that the punishment should be to suffer the way the animal or people suffer under the cruelty of the person charged with the crime…. 👿

                    Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
                    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.