- This topic has 10 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 18 years ago by .
-
Posts
-
What do you guys think? Should we turn this one in?
That’s the same manufacturer as some other dragons that have already been brought up, though I don’t know if they actually got reported to John, come to think of it. Definitely a rip off, especially if you go look at the matching standing dragon.
Nirvanacat13 wrote:What do you guys think? Should we turn this one in?
blah….that one’s hard to tell….it wouldn’t hurt to email john and ask
The one alone wouldn’t be obvious, but look at this one. Definitely copied!
The one alone wouldn’t be obvious, but look at this one. Definitely copied!
ok yeah….and if you put them together then you really see it….
It’s so weird…these keep coming up as copyright infringement, but I swear I would never have thought “windstone” if I had seen those on my own. They don’t look anything like one to me! I understand the poses are very similar, if not directly copied, but the rest of the dragon is so different (and ugly!) I just wouldn’t make the connection.
"He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom."
-J R R TolkienArlla wrote:It’s so weird…these keep coming up as copyright infringement, but I swear I would never have thought “windstone” if I had seen those on my own. They don’t look anything like one to me! I understand the poses are very similar, if not directly copied, but the rest of the dragon is so different (and ugly!) I just wouldn’t make the connection.
Mel does have a copyright on the pose though. =P
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
