fbpx

Does Airbrushing "take away" from Art?

Home Forums Windstone Editions Paint-Your-Own Windstone Does Airbrushing "take away" from Art?

Viewing 6 posts - 31 through 36 (of 36 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #550375

    As with any tool, depends how the airbrush is used. And as others have pointed out, the end result counts as well. I don’t have a problem using a method to paint something that takes 5 hours instead of 50 hours but the tradeoff is you can’t justify charging the same you would for 50 hours of work.

    #550376

    Nirvanacat13 wrote:

    Oh it IS an art form in and of itself…I mean, look at the people who airbrush designs and pictures on cars and motorcycles….

    http://www.fastcoolcars.com/Heros-truck.htm

    That truck makes me cry everytime I see it……

    Wow! I gawped at those pics for a good while. Impressive.

    #550377
    Skigod377
    Participant

      sunhawk wrote:

      I don’t have a problem using a method to paint something that takes 5 hours instead of 50 hours but the tradeoff is you can’t justify charging the same you would for 50 hours of work.

      Ooh… very good point Sunhawk.

      #550378

      skigod377 wrote:

      sunhawk wrote:

      I don’t have a problem using a method to paint something that takes 5 hours instead of 50 hours but the tradeoff is you can’t justify charging the same you would for 50 hours of work.

      Ooh… very good point Sunhawk.

      I agree. Speaking as a collector, what I’d be willing to pay is determined by what items of similar type and quality level generally sell for. So if the 50 hours of work looks the same as the 5 hours of work, and all the other artists are charging based on 5 hours of work, why would I want to pay for 50 hours of work?

      #550379

      Yep, I agree. It is the end result. I have some paint can art that is really cool. I am just amaized how they do that.

      #550380

      mimitrek wrote:

      skigod377 wrote:

      sunhawk wrote:

      I don’t have a problem using a method to paint something that takes 5 hours instead of 50 hours but the tradeoff is you can’t justify charging the same you would for 50 hours of work.

      Ooh… very good point Sunhawk.

      I agree. Speaking as a collector, what I’d be willing to pay is determined by what items of similar type and quality level generally sell for. So if the 50 hours of work looks the same as the 5 hours of work, and all the other artists are charging based on 5 hours of work, why would I want to pay for 50 hours of work?

      Exactly, so in that case, using an airbrush is just a practical decision, not something that should detract from the art. Some people value the art they buy by how many individual brushstrokes it took and some folk value their art by how it looks and aren’t too concerned about the actual methodology involved. Different strokes for different folks and I’d like to think that difference helps us find a niche to be able to make money doing something we not only enjoy but have a talent for, whether it’s airbrushing or painting by hand or any other method.

    Viewing 6 posts - 31 through 36 (of 36 total)
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.