fbpx

another dragon…peacock???

Home Forums Windstone Editions General Windstone another dragon…peacock???

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #601700
    KoishiiKitty
    Participant

      I was cruising DA looking at dragon arts when I saw tis one..those funky blue dragons…except this one is painted peacock coloring and has all the gold highlights! what do you guys think of it? too close or an ok mistake?
      i have not notified john or any one else about this yet:

      http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/59971580/

      #492018
      KoishiiKitty
      Participant

        #601701
        .
        Participant

          When will they stop! We see that one on Ebay a lot.

          #601702

          Hmm, I am not sure why that person is showing it to us. Did they repaint it?

          #601703
          Jennifer
          Keymaster

            These are on eBay all the time, though in a slightly different coloration. Please do feel free to send it to John. The gold markings are a problem.

            Volunteer mod- I'm here to help! Email me for the best response: nambroth at gmail.com
            My art: featherdust.com

            #601704
            Maria
            Participant

              SIlver’s right. It’s getting boring and annoying. That dragon is so ugly anyway.

              #601705
              KoishiiKitty
              Participant

                noted John. siad it was one that they dealt with a while ago and should no longer be selling.

                #601706
                Maria
                Participant

                  Should. πŸ˜•

                  #601707

                  I guess you caould call this a violet flame πŸ˜€

                  http://www.thesorcererslibrary.com/TSL/andrewbill_specials/piecepages/marauder_no008.htm

                  He has gold highlights too πŸ˜†

                  #601708
                  Maria
                  Participant

                    You could, but the texture and sculpt of the scales is different so it does end being a different coloration. It’s obviously not copied from Windstone.

                    #601709
                    Aldana
                    Participant

                      Griffiness was mentioning it was like the colour scheme of violet flame more then that the sculpt was a copy I believe GB.

                      I Would love an Old Warrior one day.. any Old Warrior!

                      #601710

                      Oh no i wasn’t pointing it out like that GB, Aldana right. I think anyone can see its not the sculpt. It was done along time before VF came around and the collector who has it doesn’t follow windstones she does not even know about them. I just wondered if everyone thought ‘it looks like a colour of a windstone it must be a copy’ πŸ™ Rather then considereing that it may have been done before πŸ˜• Last time i checked everyone thought the piece was a copy i think some one even reported my rainbow piece πŸ™ But that was done years ago and i definately didnt know about Windstones and well if you knew my history with bright colours πŸ˜†

                      #601711
                      Akeyla
                      Participant

                        I dont think its the persons fault owning the dragon. I picked tons of stuff on garage sales not knowing where it came from. But I agree, I am sick and tired of seeing those creeps, I’ve seen lotsa kitsch and this is not even kitsch. The way the dragon stares is like a sunstroked-dumbedout-headsquashed chicken. Mind you i love chickens, had 3 as pets and let them live until their feathers were gray.

                        Other note, person pictures random object in house and gets a dragon feature? hellogoodmorningwhatdidImiss???

                        /end rant on bad day

                        #601712
                        Maria
                        Participant

                          Griffiness wrote:

                          Oh no i wasn’t pointing it out like that GB, Aldana right. I think anyone can see its not the sculpt. It was done along time before VF came around and the collector who has it doesn’t follow windstones she does not even know about them. I just wondered if everyone thought ‘it looks like a colour of a windstone it must be a copy’ πŸ™ Rather then considereing that it may have been done before πŸ˜• Last time i checked everyone thought the piece was a copy i think some one even reported my rainbow piece πŸ™ But that was done years ago and i definately didnt know about Windstones and well if you knew my history with bright colours πŸ˜†

                          I can see the sculpt isn’t a copy, obviously. I just meant that in order for the coloring to be a copy of Windstone’s violet flame, it would have to be placed differently on the body of the dragon. I guess I didn’t word it clearly.

                          #601713
                          Jennifer
                          Keymaster

                            You’re right, GB. πŸ™‚

                            And, actually Windstone can protect their colors even if it’s on a non-Windstone looking dragon.

                            But, it has to be something that is substantially similar (in coloration). For example…

                            Chessie wrote:

                            This dragon sculpture is completely original. However, the color is obviously Windstone’s Brown, complete with turquoise detailing. I think the final agreement between the company that made these and Windstone was that they could continue to produce the dragons, they just couldn’t make them with Windstone’s color designs.

                            So yes, the coloration is something Windstone has had to protect even though it was on a totally original sculpture.

                            Volunteer mod- I'm here to help! Email me for the best response: nambroth at gmail.com
                            My art: featherdust.com

                          Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
                          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.