fbpx

So, did a forum member win this?

Home Forums Miscellany Community So, did a forum member win this?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #741086

    http://cgi.ebay.com/Mother-DRAGON-w-Baby-Print-Windstones-Artist-PENA-1981_W0QQitemZ270298836555QQihZ017QQcategoryZ35865QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

    I LOVE this print. How adorable are those babies? <3 I bid and lost of course though.

    Anyone we know win this? If so, can we see pictures! ^.^

    #497049

    #741087
    Copper83
    Participant

      I was bidding on it too, but I didn’t win it. I would have loved to have it to go with the male dragon print that I have. It just went a lot higher than I was willing to go.

      #741088
      Jasmine
      Participant

        I bid and lost too. Just can’t spend that much with Christmas shopping to be done.

        #741089

        I wanted to see who won that one as well, and the male dragon print. I only bid on (and won) the unicorn one.

        #741090

        Congrats, siberakh. I was surprised at how high the one print went.

        #741091
        Purplecat
        Participant

          me too….I got mine for $15….but I think I got lucky, as it was mislabeled. 🙂 It is an awesome print though, and well worth having, congrats to whomever won it! 😀

          #741092
          Melissa
          Participant

            Holy flying mackerel, I have a beltbuckle that looks just like that print. 😯

            Off to report to John I guess.

            #741093
            Jasmine
            Participant

              Maplecarver wrote:

              Holy flying mackerel, I have a beltbuckle that looks just like that print. 😯

              Off to report to John I guess.

              Oops… 😆

              #741094

              Maplecarver wrote:

              Holy flying mackerel, I have a beltbuckle that looks just like that print. 😯

              Off to report to John I guess.

              Really? Can we see a photo?

              #741095
              Melissa
              Participant

                Of course.

                I thought it was a nicer than average design when I bought it, now I know why… 😛

                #741096

                Maplecarver wrote:

                Of course.

                I thought it was a nicer than average design when I bought it, now I know why… 😛

                it looks a bit similar but i would have to say its not a rip off. when it comes to mystical creatures your gonna have quite a few similar looking representations.

                #741097
                Melissa
                Participant

                  I would say the pose and the babies taken alone could be coincidence, just as every curled up western dragon isn’t a Mother. But the scale pattern and wing shape is extremely close.

                  #741098
                  Pegasi1978
                  Participant

                    Maplecarver wrote:

                    I would say the pose and the babies taken alone could be coincidence, just as every curled up western dragon isn’t a Mother. But the scale pattern and wing shape is extremely close.

                    My thoughts exactly. I see several similarities but at the same time I see some differences – like they intentionally changed some things hoping people wouldn’t recognize where the inspiration for the piece came from. No matter what it can’t hurt to send a photo of the belt buckle along with any details you might have about it (manufacturer’s name or where you bought it) to John so he can have the final say on it.

                    #741099
                    Melissa
                    Participant

                      Yup, I sent him the info.

                      It’s a bit of a shame. Whoever made that, clearly had enough technical skill that they could have come up with something very nice by themselves. Or have learned to. 😕

                    Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)
                    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.